October 16, 2023

The "Write" Stuff

Strengthen your audit documentation and business communications skills!

Auditors are relied upon for their ability to analyze and audit financial statements and footnote disclosures, but equally as important is their ability to write — and communicate — effectively. Whether it’s preparing audit documentation or replying to a client’s email, the ability to communicate accurately and clearly is key. When performing an audit of financial statements are involved, written proof is always critical, so it’s imperative to be able to communicate these matters in a concise and articulate way in order to satisfy Professional Standards, regulators and standard-setters.

Here are some tips to add polish to two common types of communications auditors use:

 

The ABCs of Audit Documentation


For auditors, being able to draft audit documentation that can stand on its own without any verbal explanation by the engagement team is the goal. Prepare audit documentation sufficient to enable an “experienced auditor” who has no previous connection with the engagement to understand the nature, timing and extent of the auditing procedures performed, the results of audit procedures and evidence obtained and the significant judgments made and conclusions reached on significant findings or issues. Well-written audit workpaper documentation can be a great asset in enhancing audit quality as well as helping audit engagement teams plan and perform their audits, enable them to demonstrate accountability for their work, and will serve as a record of matters of continuing significance to future audits of the same entry. For each required audit procedure, auditors should document:

  • Identifying characteristics of specific items tested
  • Who performed and date of performance
  • Who reviewed and date/extent of review

 

Here are some important tips to follow:


Time is of the essence. Documentation should be prepared on a timely basis. The longer you wait, the less information you will be able to recall.


Don’t over-write. Can you have too much audit documentation? Actually yes; it’s very common. Don’t overburden the engagement partner, engagement quality control reviewer, peer reviewer, regulators, standard-setters and others with items that do not support material transactions and testing procedures. And be sure to remove superseded workpapers, open items listings, and items in the trash folder.


Include these essential items. Ensure that your audit workpaper documentation includes:

  • Overall responses to address the assessed risks of misstatement at the financial statement level
  • Nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures
  • Linkage of procedures with the assessed risks at the relevant assertion level
  • Results of those audit procedures
  • Conclusions reached by team
  • Significant issues, findings, and judgments
  • Nature of findings or issues discussed
  • When and with whom discussions took place
  • Document how inconsistencies were addressed


Be mindful of legal considerations. Avoid including commentary or information that could call the audit into question. For instance, do not make extraneous remarks (example: “This client’s books are a mess!”) or statements that may discredit your work (example: “Close enough for government work!”).


Retention of work papers. In keeping with Professional Standards, workpapers for audits of privately-held companies should be retained for a minimum of five years from the report release date.

 

Crafting Better Emails


As the most common method of quick communication between auditors & CPAs and clients, emails are often used to respond to requests, ask a quick question or quickly summarize an attachment. The most important thing to remember when writing an email is that people are busy and may receive hundreds of emails. The key to writing an effective email is to tell recipients only what they need to know in as short a manner as possible.

A general rule of thumb is to use the inverted pyramid principle of putting the most important things at the top so they won’t get missed. If you have to write more than a paragraph, consider using bullet points so that the reader can move quickly through the text. To make things easy for the reader, use a strong, descriptive subject line (example: “Filing deadline for the financial statements is October 15th” or “Quick question about your footnote disclosure”) so that the reader understands the importance of the content.


Finally, don’t try to cover too much in one email; you may confuse and overwhelm the recipient. If you find that the email is getting too lengthy, consider cutting it into smaller topic-based emails that get sent to the client at staggered dates. Most importantly, remember that emails become official documents that may be referenced at a later date. With that in mind, pick up the phone if you want to share highly confidential or sensitive information.

 

Need more help? Invest in your professional development by taking a professional writing course tailored toward auditors and CPAs.

It’s important to remember that the world of accounting and auditing can be daunting for outsiders — even for professional staff with years of experience. As an auditor, you can bridge this gap by ensuring your communications are clear and to the point. Your clients will appreciate that as much as they value your analytical and technical skills.

 

Collemi Consulting leverages nearly three decades of experience to provide trusted technical accounting and auditing expertise when you need it the most. We regularly work with CPA firm leadership to help them reduce risk and maximize efficiencies. To schedule an appointment, contact us at (732) 792-6101.


Learn More
By Jennifer Ruf March 24, 2025
As audit season is in high gear, it’s important for auditors to step back and plan how they are going to audit a client’s books and records. What are the red flags you’re looking for when it comes time to throw open the books and look through a huge swath of journal entries to pluck out the ones that are questionable, and need to be questioned? First off, it’s important to understand how journal entries are created at the company being audited. For an auditor, that means looking at the internal control environment to understand how a journal entry is created: Who’s authorized to create one and who can create one. You have to understand the process. How does it start and how is the entry eventually recorded onto the financial reporting system? Once you know that, you can determine whether someone can come in and override the system, or if someone can pretend to be someone else and start recording journal entries onto the system. That will help you figure out what to look for to decide what entries to pull out and ask management to get back up information to support and validate those entries. Finding the needle The key here is not to just go through the mechanics, but to really go through the exercise so you can determine if management is playing games in the recording of those transactions. You have to be able to get comfortable with that, and that means you need to be able to document what you’re looking for. Because what the auditor is really doing is looking for a “needle in the haystack”, to identify the transactions that don’t look right, that don’t make sense in the ordinary course of business. For example, if the business is not open on weekends, are transactions being posted on a Saturday or Sunday, or even on holidays? If you see rounded numbers or accounts that are seldom used, those can be red flags as well. Sometimes it can be as simple as asking managers and others like accounting, data entry and IT personnel if they’ve observed any unusual accounting entries. Depending on the size of the company and scope of the work, you might need to use computerized audit software program — some of them with AI built in — that can scan the entries to identify anomalies. Red flags When an auditor is looking for evidence of management override of controls, they can look for some of these 12 red flags indicators: ● Top-side entries ● Entries made to unrelated, unusual or seldom-used accounts ● Entries made by individuals who typically don't make entries. ● Entries recorded at the end of the period ● Post-closing entries with no explanations ● Entries made before or during the preparation of financial statements with no account numbers ● Entries that contain rounded numbers or a consistent ending number ● Entries processed outside the normal course of business ● Accounts that contain transactions that are complex or unusual in nature ● Accounts that contain significant estimates and period-end adjustments ● Accounts that have been prone to errors in the past ● Accounts that contain intercompany transactions When testing non-standard journal entries and other adjustments, you should look for documentary evidence indicating that they were properly supported and approved by management. Finally, remember that while most fraudulent entries are made at the end of a reporting period, you shouldn't ignore the rest of the year  Collemi Consulting leverages nearly three decades of experience to provide trusted technical accounting and auditing expertise when you need it the most. We regularly work with CPA firm leadership to help them reduce risk and maximize efficiencies. To schedule an appointment, contact us at (732) 792-6101.
December 20, 2024
Are you prepared?
A woman's hands holding a microphone
December 9, 2024
Conquer your fear of public speaking and present like a pro
Man with hand by his ear straining to listen.
December 4, 2024
Boost your business by becoming adept at active listening.
More Posts
Share by: